What is the main categories of Helel's argument in Part One of the Essay

What is the main categories of Helels cause in Part One of the Philosophy of Right and how are they logically connected - testify ExampleBrooks, on the other hand, identifies two great debates on the Philosophy of Right, as the work is more commonly known, namely nonpareil over its policy-making sympathies and another on its relationship to metaphysics (2007).Thus, the low gear debate is thought to have arisen since the books first appearance, where the Philosophy of Right had been charged with a heavy conservatism (Brooks, 2007) and the earliest reviews written by those Hegel had considered friends of him were nearly uniformly negative (Wood, 1991). These early attacks, however, viewed the book in relation to the immediate political situation, which may count on for the reason why it was read as a blessing on the political status quo not surprisingly, commentators and scholars in the liberal tradition followed that interpretation (Wood, 1991).The bet on debate, according to Brooks (2007), divided the scholarship into two camps adherents of the metaphysical approach to the study of Hegels work and such of the non-metaphysical approach to Hegels work. Whereas the first debate, about the nature of Hegels political philosophy, is believed to be over, with the assertion that Hegels views lie in between the extremities of conservatism and liberalism, the second one has developed into an argument about how strongly metaphysical is Hegels Philosophy of Right (Brooks, 2007).This paper is intended to review Hegels Philosophy of Right, namely its Part one tweet Right, in order to establish which are the main categories of Hegels argument and how they logically connect with each other. The paper argues that it is the philosophical regularity of Hegel, which holds the key to the understanding of his logic.There are two main categories of Hegels argument in Part One of the Philosophy of Right, as follows the concept of Abstract Right and the