Aristotle vs. Plato Essay

Born in Northern Greece, Aristotles father was a court physician to the king of Macedon where Aristotle himself would be requested by male monarch Philip II to tutor his son horse parsley (who grew up to sour Alexander the Great).Aristotle, integrity of the c put up influential thinkers in philosophy including semipolitical theory is also known as the legendary Greek philosopher, logician, scientist, and savant of Plato. Aristotle studied in Platos Academy in A hences. Plato being the student of Socrates and also known as the father of political theory helped train and shape the mind of young Aristotle who then becameknown as the number one political scientist.It was the diverse atmosphere in which Aristotle was raised, along with his education and then his many travels that gave him the depth of being able to experience and see the fair and the faults in the world. Aristotle saw philosophy within the physical world. He believed that our truths came from physic onlyy breaki ng down systems and examining them to understand them. He had experience with traveling and see contrastive world regimes. Aristotle believed one had to break things down empirically and scientifically.frankincense gaining his title of political scientist who usedscientific methods to analyze and conclude his beliefs, thoughts, and opinions. Aristotle believed that one must think critically and rationally using inductive sympathy and an empiricist approach. Aristotle studied over 100 regimes and analyzed which ones were the self-coloredest, how they persisted, and which best served the tribe. He cerebrate that the best type of government regime was that of one with a strong middle class to balance the upper and lower classes to create the most stable and just fellowship.He believed that this regime would be a combining of aspects from a polity (an elected government that has themajority of the usual batchs best interest), aristocracy ( regularization by the rich but with t he peoples interest in mind), and monarchy (a single ruler if there is the strength that that metropolis has a qualified ruler as such which Aristotle admits is archaic and give the sack easily turn into tyranny).Aristotle felt that most people did non have enough intelligence or power to handle speed the government so it is best to put those in power who do. In his work, The Politics, Aristotle is explains that a metropolis is made up of many people, many individuals who possess different views and values.It is thediverse group of the city that puddles it a city. If a city were to become to a greater extent and more a unit then it would lose its uniqueness in opinions and make up and defeat the entire exposition of a city. Aristotle believes that people argon entitled to their own thoughts, opinions, and ownership. He states in his work (Politics, page 40-41) that is not in the nature of a city to be a unit. Aristotle believes that cities argon made up different mo ve and different entities that work together as a whole.They do not function as one but rather work together. Aristotle states that intense unification of a city is not a comfortablything. Aristotle states that The city exists for the sake of a good life, meaning that a city is there to function as an outlet to meet the needs of each of its citizens. Each citizen has his own need to be met. Aristotle realizes that what makes one person able may not make the other happy. It is obvious that a city which goes on becoming more and more of a unit impart eventually cease to be a city at all. A city, by its nature, is some sort of plurality (Aristotle, p. 39).Aristotle is arguing that if a city becomes more and more unified then only one utterance is heard and it leave alone then lack the veryunique components of different voices, functions, and views that made it a city in the first place. Aristotle believed that a cities usage was to enhance plurality, a diversified city that com es together to function. Known as the first political philosopher, Plato saw all physical things to be illusionary, to be a shadow of reality (Simile of a Cave) and he stated that earthly concern are falsely led by their senses. Because of this, according to Plato- only a society lead by Philosophers is a just society (Republic 473-475).Plato believes that philosophers are the only ones to seek out absolute truth andjustice and will therefore be more educated and more inclined to make the best decisions for the group. At the same time Plato thought that every person had the potential to obtain mind, truth, and knowledge by stepping out of the cave and beholding the light. Plato believed that if people were educated properly then they would make good decisions. He believed peoples basic nature to be good. Whereas Aristotle tended to more of a realist and knew that some people did not have it in them to reason or to see the light.In his book, The Republic, Plato discusses his belie f in creating a city likeutopia where there are no classes and everyone shares everything including women, children and property. Platos views are a bit unrealistic because he seems to not take into experimental condition human nature. Humans are naturally competitive and with time would become more individualistic. Plato would not agree with Aristotles passage that a city that grows into a unit will eventually cease to be a city. Plato on the contrary would state that the more of a unit the city becomes, the more of Utopia it will be with everyone in common thought and agreement, common ownership of land, animals, and women.Platos ideal city was that of a Utopian that would be governed by philosophers. He desired a perfect society with no problems where people were happy. His society would consist of three classes rulers, auxiliaries and laborers. The rulers would be the philosopher kings, would always rule the state. The auxiliaries (warriors) would defend the state and the labor ers would be responsible for material production of goods postulate by the state. Plato believed that the philosopher kings should run the state being that they are the wisest and best possible candidates.Plato was completely molded by his teacher Socrates, taking on all of histhoughts and philosophies whereas Platos student Aristotle took on many of his own conclusions and thoughts many measure contradicting Platos. Plato was more of a dreamer while Aristotle was more of a realist. Where Plato sought-after(a) out the Utopia ideal situation, Aristotle sought out how to better the incumbent situation. Another difference rough Aristotle and Platos approach is that Plato is more focus on the perfection of the world and how people come to know about this. While Aristotle focuses more on the observations in nature and he knows not everything in nature is perfect.Aristotle, unlikePlato, was not focused or come to about the idea of a perfect society instead he wanted to improve upon the one that he was part of during his existence. He believed that society should strive to utilize the best system it can attain. He felt that utopia was unrealistic and pointless. It would be best that society was at its highest potential and you can only improve upon the existing one. Therefore the unity of a city would diminish the individuality and different components that uniquely make up a city, thus in the end the destruction of the very meaning and function of what a city ought to be.