Sunday, February 17, 2019
Jefferson and Hamilton Essay -- essays research papers
The post-revolutionary war period of the Unites States see the establish handst of the first party system and an enlarging gap in viewpoints amongst the wealthy and the common adult male. The contradictory views of Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were primarily amenable for the testify of political parties from 1783-1800.Alexander Hamilton exerted the most influence in the impudent Federalist Party. He believed that only an enlightened ruling class could produce a stable and effective federal political science. The government therefore needed the financial support of wealthy men. Thomas Jefferson and the republicans defended to a greater extent the rights of the common man and an agrarian society with little power from the federal government. His basic principle was "in ordinary I believe the decisions of the hoi polloi in a body bequeath be more honest and more disinterested than those of wealthy men."The Republican Party attracted more of the common peop le while the Federalist Party pull support from the aristocracy. Although neither side was willing to admit to it, these institutions were known as the "first party system." Both parties stance on who should have more power in the government contributed to the largely divers views of the common man and the wealthy man.When the cut Revolution grew to its most radical peak the Federalists reacted with annoyance as citizens overthrew the aristocracy. In launching the New Ship of State Hamilton said, "The build of France is compared with that of America during its late Revolution. I own I do not like the comparison...well informed men must equally unite in the doubt whether this free and good government be likely to take place." Thomas Jeffersons reception was "I still hope the Revolution will issue happily...The biliary of the whole earth was depending on the issue of the contest, and was ever such a prize won with so little innocent blood?" some(prenomina l) Republicans even imitated French Jacobins in dress and in speaking. The difference between the Federalist and Republican social philosophies is most easily seen among their different reactions to the French Revolution. Federalists called for a national debt to be funded and hoped to render a large national brim credited by wealthy men. He defended it in a excogitate presented to Congress by claiming "where the authority of the government is general it can create corp... ...Sedition Acts exercise a power nowhere delegated to the Federal government...this commonwealth does have that the said disaffect and Sedition Acts are violations of the said Constitution." The resolutions nullified the laws and contributed to the rise of Republicanism and the fall of Federalism. The differing opinions on how the government in the post-Revolutionary war period should be run ultimately created the first rise in political parties. The Federalist printing in a government run by wealt hy men and opposing Republican support for and agrarian society split the nations people in support of a government most beneficial to them. Differing reactions to the French Revolution showed the distinct difference in Federalist and Republican belief of who the government should be run under. The National Bank and the excise tax on liquor revealed differing views on how strictly the Constitution should be interpreted and the Alien and Sedition Acts reveal an attempt of one party to dissolve another. The distinguish views of Hamiltons Federalism and Jeffersons Republicanism were the ultimate contributors to splitting the nation on views and establishing the first political parties.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment